PDA

View Full Version : V12



enawazh
09-26-2006, 06:16 PM
just for kicks

is there anyway we can cram this baby into a 202?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/MERCEDES-92-95-600SEL-600SL-S600-6-0-V12-ENGINE_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ33615QQihZ016QQi temZ260033728577

omeyhomey
09-26-2006, 06:42 PM
Originally posted by enawazh
just for kicks

is there anyway we can cram this baby into a 202?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/MERCEDES-92-95-600SEL-600SL-S600-6-0-V12-ENGINE_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ33615QQihZ016QQi temZ260033728577

hhahah, don't we all wish .

trymonlam
09-26-2006, 08:17 PM
with enough money, anything is possible. paul here (23K) is a good example of that.

Abuimad
09-26-2006, 10:09 PM
even if it does fit, like hell will i buy a 92-95 mercedes V12....

Proven Guilty
09-26-2006, 11:04 PM
Originally posted by enawazh
just for kicks

is there anyway we can cram this baby into a 202?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/MERCEDES-92-95-600SEL-600SL-S600-6-0-V12-ENGINE_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ33615QQihZ016QQi temZ260033728577

sure, just need to move the firewall back about 6 inches, and pull the engine each time you want to change the plugs. lols :D

jnenad16
09-27-2006, 12:44 AM
thats not even an V12, its a M119 V8. also, check out their auction for M113 V8 4.3, its actually a M111 I4 engine.

nenad

enawazh
09-27-2006, 04:03 AM
Seriously, dam they need to get their stuff right ?

and ya imagine the spark plugs hehehe LMFAO

its just that i saw that they used a variant of these in the zonda and shwiiing!!!

i just wanna go fast.... why does everything have to be so expensive... its so much cheaper back home.

Abuimad
09-27-2006, 05:04 AM
damn ebay....and damn those people whom label one thing for the other..

black96benz
09-27-2006, 09:47 AM
Yeah it would be nice if it were labeled correctly. How to they have 99% feedback when they obviously have a four cylinder listed as a V8 4.3.

rollinrealbig
09-27-2006, 02:38 PM
Originally posted by Proven Guilty
sure, just need to move the firewall back about 6 inches, and pull the engine each time you want to change the plugs. lols :D

or extend the front clip and make it long like the SL :D

Pagz
09-27-2006, 06:50 PM
Originally posted by trymonlam
with enough money, anything is possible. paul here (23K) is a good example of that.

no no ima bad example!,i could have had a twin turbo V8 in there for less than the cost of my performance mods LOOOL:Paranoid:

enawazh
09-28-2006, 01:17 AM
True, but you would have had a really heavy front end .
Throw away all your balance.

what you've done is unique and gutsy.
Respect.

Mercedes DIY
09-28-2006, 01:39 AM
yeah.. and those v12's werent even that powerfull either.. how much HP did they have again? and your check engine light would be on every other day for something different :confused:

Pagz
09-28-2006, 12:12 PM
Originally posted by enawazh
True, but you would have had a really heavy front end .
Throw away all your balance.

what you've done is unique and gutsy.
Respect.

Fair comment,thanks man!

enawazh
09-28-2006, 12:32 PM
Wikipedia

6.0L 408 hp V12(1991-1993)
6.0L 389 hp V12(1994-1999)

trymonlam
09-28-2006, 12:34 PM
Originally posted by enawazh
Wikipedia

6.0L 408 hp V12(1991-1993)
6.0L 389 hp V12(1994-1999)

that's a rather significant reduction in power. what happened there?

enawazh
09-28-2006, 12:45 PM
Im guessing something to do with smog.

OCKlasse
09-28-2006, 01:23 PM
Originally posted by enawazh
Im guessing something to do with smog.

yeah it is most likely OBD-II

Abuimad
09-28-2006, 02:45 PM
19hp's gone to save the enviroment..who said the benz is not green friendly

enawazh
09-29-2006, 04:32 AM
Speaking of GREEN

Check out UREA

http://www.worldcarfans.com/news.cfm?newsid=2050607.004/country/gcf

Proven Guilty
09-29-2006, 09:06 AM
wow, 140hp with 70-84MPG estimates. i don't care if its ugly, that's crazy cheap to drive for commuting!

Abuimad
09-29-2006, 09:09 AM
yeah its true....but cant they work a lil on the looks..or is that how future cars are supposed to look...ugly...

trymonlam
09-29-2006, 02:39 PM
Originally posted by Abuimad
yeah its true....but cant they work a lil on the looks..or is that how future cars are supposed to look...ugly...
well, according to mercedes, that's the most aerodynamic shape ever. so yeah, probably can't do without that.

Abuimad
09-29-2006, 04:30 PM
Originally posted by trymonlam
well, according to mercedes, that's the most aerodynamic shape ever. so yeah, probably can't do without that.

well the CLS is very aerodynamic and look how good it turned out to look...what kills me is that with the new euro laws of pedestrian safety...it realy makes the car look really..really..really..bad..and now i guess the more safe and aerodynamic the car is...the more ugly its getting...

c55m8o
09-29-2006, 04:35 PM
Originally posted by enawazh
just for kicks
is there anyway we can cram this baby into a 202? ignoring the size, I don't think you realize how heavy that engine is! Go to a site that has automotive specs and compare the weights of a early '90s SL600 and SL500 ... you have any idea how that would handle? ....and even with all the extra HP, have a look at the difference in performance specs like 0-60. so if you even could fit it, you think it'd be worth it now?

c55m8o
09-29-2006, 04:40 PM
Originally posted by Abuimad
even if it does fit, like hell will i buy a 92-95 mercedes V12.... it couldn't have worse fuel economy then a R107 560SL... :D Seriously tho ... those engines had a major [I mean M A J O R] problem with the wiring of the throttle body. You can almost count on the insulation crystalizing and breaking apart and wiring shorting. A super expensive item. Kept me from buying an early '90s SL.

trymonlam
10-01-2006, 10:45 AM
Originally posted by c55m8o
it couldn't have worse fuel economy then a R107 560SL... :D Seriously tho ... those engines had a major [I mean M A J O R] problem with the wiring of the throttle body. You can almost count on the insulation crystalizing and breaking apart and wiring shorting. A super expensive item. Kept me from buying an early '90s SL.

hmm... would u happen to know if this problem applies to the late w126s? i plan to get one of those to replace my 94' Jag XJ6 3.2S at home. (the model's not available in US). i got a WALD dealer in my town. huh huh....:p

c55m8o
10-01-2006, 06:54 PM
Originally posted by trymonlam
hmm... would u happen to know if this problem applies to the late w126s? I think the problem was limited to the early 90's V12 ... not just in the SL. (2 throttle bodies; double the cost). I think it was corrected by about 97 or 98.

trymonlam
10-01-2006, 08:02 PM
Originally posted by c55m8o
I think the problem was limited to the early 90's V12 ... not just in the SL. (2 throttle bodies; double the cost). I think it was corrected by about 97 or 98.
good to know. so would i be correct that a v8 would be ok?
by the way, is that your dog?

c55m8o
10-01-2006, 09:18 PM
Originally posted by trymonlam
good to know. so would i be correct that a v8 would be ok?
by the way, is that your dog? I don't 'think' so. But I didn't query my mechanic about them really, because it was only the early 90's SL600 that interested me at the time. I do know they (V8 vs. V12) used a totally different Bosche ME version, so that hints at other things being different in the engine control.

Yep, that's my 2nd Shiba we just adopted a few months back. She had the helmet on @ the time having just been spade; I thought it framed the head perfect. Believe it or not it was a great 'happy face', but that shot was a blurry throw-away pic. But with resolution re-sizing along with image sharpening during evey step, I ended up with that.