PDA

View Full Version : My 202 on the dyno... (+ PICS)



Powerslave
04-15-2007, 12:48 PM
Hey folks...

I managed to get the whole thing on the dyno to get some numbers out...

So here it is...
My C180 turned into a C220 plus Supersprint headers, Americat cat, Eisenmann muffler and JR sports filter


Horsepower: 177.1 bhp @ 6000 rpm
http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/8876/powerslavehorsepowerdynqn1.jpg

Torgue 223.4 Nm @ 5000 rpm
http://img107.imageshack.us/img107/8224/powerslavetorguedynooc0.jpg

http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/9928/dyno1rp6.jpg
http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/9189/dyno2pb7.jpg
http://img122.imageshack.us/img122/4059/dyno3kv2.jpg
http://img122.imageshack.us/img122/1307/dyno4ql8.jpg

Nelson Lago
04-15-2007, 01:30 PM
never seen that color 202 but i dyno my c280 and got 146hp but then relised that the 1 to1 gear ratio is fourth and i dyno in third so if im not mistaken i thing i should have about 170 ish to the wheels stock but nice it musted sounded nice

Pagz
04-15-2007, 02:21 PM
looking great dude!!
You got ~2hp more than my stock manual C230K so you must have done somthing right!!
Must be a noticable upgrade for sure!?!

where to next?

jstrat85
04-15-2007, 05:31 PM
its the headers! i felt a huge change in the car when i had this mod done!

Nelson Lago
04-15-2007, 06:36 PM
Seriously man really wish my 202 was manual i mean i know how bad their manual trannys are ( but i have been in the new SLK with the manual tranny and it's sopposed to be a crapy tranny too but i thought it felt very good). i dont care how bad thay are i want one

OCKlasse
04-16-2007, 09:02 AM
so how do YOU like the car?

Proven Guilty
04-16-2007, 11:52 AM
that torque is fucking amazing!

C280/////AMG
04-16-2007, 12:02 PM
Bravo re!!! That's unbelievable!!!! How the hell do they manage to get so much bhp from a 220??? are those the only mods?

Nelson Lago
04-16-2007, 06:06 PM
dont get too excited check out how much hp honda gets with a 2.2 ............................and whats Ameri cat a high flow cat

Powerslave
04-17-2007, 03:10 PM
Heeeeeeey! Well answers for all:

1. Yeah noticable difference... from the 122 I had before :) Ohh and I have 152 hp on the wheel... :(

2. Well it must be the headers...

3. I love the car, I'm drifting it all the time

4. The torgue is ok... but after 5000 rpm (the peak) it dives till 6500 and the wideband ë sensor said that my fuel mixture is running lean at high rpm

5. Yup! These are the only mods...

6. Haha... You mean the R Spec's Honda S2000 2.2 with 313bhp... I witnessed this ultimate car 2 hours ago... IT'S AMAZING!

As far as the AFR mixture problem I'm thinking the solution of a piggyback ECU... DASTEK maybe... plus this ecu will control my inactive HFM (variable timing)

plus plus I plan to upgrade my CAI with a BMC CDA...

YOUR COMMENTS AND HELP PLEASE!

NEA-4311
04-18-2007, 02:30 PM
Nice results! Arent you suppose to run it smoothly for like 5000 kms or something cause of the new block? Dont rev your car maaan and dont drift it!!! (yet). So how much HP do you recon you got out of your Supersprint header?

Powerslave
04-18-2007, 11:28 PM
Hey,

NO! This not a new block... i changed the whole engine... Intake, injection etc etc...
And it wasn't new of course...

C220 stock is 147bhp...
I'm 177bhp... SO...

C280/////AMG
04-19-2007, 10:14 AM
Originally posted by Nelson Lago
dont get too excited check out how much hp honda gets with a 2.2 ............................and whats Ameri cat a high flow cat

Yes, but this car has a very advanced V-TEC inlet and exhaust timing system, which the 220 doesn't have.

Furthermore, the honda revs to about 9000rpm, and this is why it develops these horses. Powerslave's 220 develops his hp at around 6500rpm. This is why i'm astounded

Nelson Lago
04-19-2007, 05:34 PM
true true

Powerslave
08-02-2008, 05:14 AM
Guys the numbers were way off...

I dynoed it again at the MAHA dyno and got 163 bhp... I will post the plot soon...

ludachris
08-18-2008, 08:54 PM
DynoJet

Powerslave
04-04-2009, 02:38 PM
HERE ARE THE REAL NUMBERS... :(

@ Maha dyno...

http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/5968/scan0002e.th.jpg (http://img17.imageshack.us/my.php?image=scan0002e.jpg)

D-money
05-09-2009, 09:12 PM
Originally posted by Nelson Lago
Seriously man really wish my 202 was manual i mean i know how bad their manual trannys are ( but i have been in the new SLK with the manual tranny and it's sopposed to be a crapy tranny too but i thought it felt very good). i dont care how bad thay are i want one
get a manual bmw

SLAMMED_C
05-11-2009, 08:57 PM
Originally posted by Powerslave
HERE ARE THE REAL NUMBERS... :(

@ Maha dyno...

http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/5968/scan0002e.th.jpg (http://img17.imageshack.us/my.php?image=scan0002e.jpg)
so your putting 163hp to the wheels? thats pretty decent for N/A 2.2L motor.
Im supercharged running 12lbs of boost and im only putting 187hp to the wheels!! mind you i havent installed my SuperSprint header yet.. that should be good for a few hp's!

Powerslave
05-17-2009, 01:13 AM
No my friend! It's 163bhp to the crankshaft!
And i'm about to replace cams with reprofiled ones... 264 duration 9,5mm lift
i hope i'll see a few hp there too :)