any one seen this little guy

[ncd]

http://www2.discountmbparts.com/part...+Saver&dp=true

I rember reading about a guy who fited something to get a better MPG.. I suppose it must of been this.. from what ive read it just slots into the Air intake!

or prehaps this one:
http://www.engineionizer.com/?gclid=...FQ9iMAodHCpbUg

http://www.wcpo.com/external/dwym/c3b519.html
heres what others with SUV's thought..

[rollinrealbig]

looks BS

[therock2689]

Originally posted by rollinrealbig
looks BS

Looks BS, rollin, it is BS. You might get a bit better MPG, but not 20+HP or any of that BS.

[ncd]

Originally posted by therock2689
Looks BS, rollin, it is BS. You might get a bit better MPG, but not 20+HP or any of that BS.

hey if their was a fuel effiecency section I would of posted it their.

It would be intresting to see how each of them performed and how they did combined, strictly speaking on the fuel efficiency and on the c230K.

:ermm:

you gota admit making the air intakes like that of a jet engine does sound sort of cool.. (i know our sc probably already does to some degree) and so does inoizing the air+fuel mixture before fireing

[rollinrealbig]

im just saying i hear none of that works. i never tried and dont care about it.

[therock2689]

Originally posted by ncd
so does inoizing the air+fuel mixture before fireing

What is suposidly does is makes a spinning effect on the incoming air charge. In theory what it does is to make the air and the fuel mix and then burn more evenly. Not that is in theory. What it probly does is cause some air resiction and posible a loss in power. I think that they take the concept off of jets or something i dont realy know. But air under presure is more prone to straghtening out and comeing back together.
It just pure BS that thing, dont waste your $60.


Rock

[ncd]

fairy enough :bandit:

[trymonlam]

didn't nenad tried it and had some decent result in this? he's got a old thread on here about this.