Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 59

Thread: C36 Manual conversion

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    322

    C36 Manual conversion

    Hey All

    I have got it into my head recently that it would be great to convert my C36 to a Manual 5 speed.

    Looking at a Toyota W58 gearbox as they can handle a fair amount of abuse and are pretty cheap to pick up ($500NZD or so)

    I would need a new pedal box, bell housing, flywheel?? and clutch, have I missed anything?

    Am I completely insane?

    Tips and opinions please

    Cheers
    Tom
    1995 C36 ///AMG

  2. #2
    Ah.. A Supra transmission..

    If the price isn't that much more, i'd suggest going with the turbo supra's manual (R154).. Here's the specsheet..

    http://www.cygnusx1.net/Supra/Librar...tion=MT&Page=2

    Can't give any comments or opinions on the idea of making it a manual, but just food for thought..

    -J..

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    322
    Thought about the R154, but they are $$$ and hard to find, the W58 is a pretty stong box.
    1995 C36 ///AMG

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,069
    did you get the idea after talking to me
    um. some computer trickery so the ecu knows your moving etc mite be needed. i would imagine this part to be tricky

    and you will need a custom flywheel but hey i now have a spare standard one you can buy off me or take to a machining shop to make a custom one. (they have a magnet in them for crank position sensor so its a bit of an ordeal)
    custom drive shaft.
    pedal box may be hard to find, the clutch master cylinder uses fluid off the brake master cylinder.
    have a look at the post by turbobenz.com builder in boba lounge he may have a cheaper way to do it keeping it mercedes parts
    -Logan-

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    133
    nevermind

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    245
    There are alot of ppl who want to do this, and rightly so. But it would be such an ordeal, i dont think it would be worth it. You would have to do so much crap to get it to work and somehow trick the ECU that its changing teh gears and not you. proly teh best thing to do it get a w203 that you can opt for manual and go from there. But if you got time, money, and alot or smart ppl who know what there doing, by all means, but probly one of the 1st US w202's that manual.


    Rock
    2000 C230K
    custom intake
    Full audio with MTX, Alpine, And Rf parts
    custom a-pillar pod

  7. #7
    Tuner/Vendor
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    93
    Originally posted by therock2689
    but probly one of the 1st US w202's that manual.


    Rock
    We built a W202 manual years ago, and I think there are a few others in the US. Also, the thread poster is not in the US, he is located in New Zealand
    www.Turbobenz.com
    1987 MB 190E - Project M104 (For Sale)
    2005 Subaru WRX - The Daily
    Shop car -
    1996 MB C280 - 5 speed/3.27 LSD/3.2L M104 swap

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    186
    We built a W202 manual years ago
    So, how did it work out? Was it worth the effort and how much effort was it?
    \'99 C280 Sport, Brilliant Silver w/ Xenon High Intensity headlamps/ most options

  9. #9
    Tuner/Vendor
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    93
    Totally worth it... We went with a 300E manual trans... But you have to take into consideration that when you swap your trans, you effectivly change your gear ratio, so an investment into a different differential would be highly recommended.

    I think with the stock auto diff we were seeing rediculous gearing, like 140 in 4th gear
    www.Turbobenz.com
    1987 MB 190E - Project M104 (For Sale)
    2005 Subaru WRX - The Daily
    Shop car -
    1996 MB C280 - 5 speed/3.27 LSD/3.2L M104 swap

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    3
    Have you given any thought to the Getrag out of a 2.3-16? It can definitely handle the load. Although on the downside it's a non-overdrive unit.
    \'93 W124.036 500E black pearl/black leather; 245/45-WR17 on 17x8.25 factory EvoII
    \'93 W124.036 500E bornit/black leather; european delivery; 245/45-WR17 on 17x8.25 factory EvoII
    \'88 R107.048 560SL desert taupe/dark brown leather; Euro headlights
    \'87 W201.034 190E 2.3-16 black pearl/black leather; Euro headlights; 225/45-ZR16 on 16x8 factory EvoI
    \'70 R113.044 280SL white/red; factory alloys; Euro headlights

    Coming soon! (maybe)
    1989 W201.036 w/AMG Powerpack
    or
    1996 W202.090

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    322
    Thought about it, and still in the back of my mind (along with LSD if it could be found haha)

    But a couple of things, they are not easy to find, esp in this country, and not the cheapest.

    Also, if I happend to blow somthing in the Supra box parts are plentiful and not overly expensive
    1995 C36 ///AMG

  12. #12
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    883
    i did a 5speed swap on my E36 M3 and its actually not as hard as people think. cost $2000 in parts and $1000 in labor, so $3k total. I'd love to have a 5speed C36 b/c i feel that motor has huge potential waiting to be unlocked. You will need pedal box, new master & slave cylinder, reverse light wiring harness, nuetral switch, tranny, adapter for the bell housing, different length driveshaft, and a few other things here and there. more importantly you need to find a tranny with the proper ratios. a 5speed modded C36 would definitely be a force to recon with so i say go for it if you can do it for under $3k. hope that helps

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    322
    What trans did you use for your BMW?
    1995 C36 ///AMG

  14. #14
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    883
    Originally posted by benzboy
    What trans did you use for your BMW?
    see for bmw is was much easier b/c there was already a manual transmission counterpart for the M3. you will have to go from scratch so it will cost more than $3k.

  15. #15
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    883
    Honestly your best bet would probably be a 6speed manual from a W203. i wouldn't be suprised if all the bolt patterns on the bell housing were identical and if it fit perfectly. Also I bet driveshaft may even be the same length. A 6speed C transmission with the proper clutch/flywheel setup would be able to handle the power. as far as internals i bet they are probably strong enough for 400 crank HP so for C36 application they should be perfect. also all other W203 components should swap over very easily. that is your best bet. hope that helps

  16. #16
    Tuner/Vendor
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    93
    At this point you'r almost talking apples and oranges when you move a 203 trans into the equastion... Depending on the 202 year, you are dealing with an I6 motor... I'm not sure a 203 trans would necessarily 'bolt up' without making a custom bellhousing or adapter...
    www.Turbobenz.com
    1987 MB 190E - Project M104 (For Sale)
    2005 Subaru WRX - The Daily
    Shop car -
    1996 MB C280 - 5 speed/3.27 LSD/3.2L M104 swap

  17. #17
    Originally posted by Polestar
    So, how did it work out? Was it worth the effort and how much effort was it?
    wow its a dream for me to make my 202 a manual....let alone drive a manual c36....wow.....hope it works out,
    Modified C230, Sprayed Silver Strips, Updated Grill, Tinted all round, Lowered Springs, 17inch Rimms, K&N performance Filter, Performance chip and AMG exhaust Kit, Hella bixenons with Osram Bulbs
    Just in: Pioneer sound system, 2 1000 Watt Subs, 2 Amps, and 1 Head Unit...luvin the BASS



    http://www.cardomain.com/id/abuimad

    If Its 2 (Good) 2 Be True...Then..Its a 202

  18. #18
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    883
    Originally posted by blind26
    At this point you'r almost talking apples and oranges when you move a 203 trans into the equastion... Depending on the 202 year, you are dealing with an I6 motor... I'm not sure a 203 trans would necessarily 'bolt up' without making a custom bellhousing or adapter...
    No, comparing W202-W203 tranny is like comparing red apple to granny smith apple. Benz to Toyota tranny, THATS comparing apples and oranges. Benz hardware is much more likely to adapt well. Alot of times the bolt patterns on the housings are very similar on benzes so it would be much more likely to work than a toyota tranny, plus ... its real OEM benz parts, not a Toyota frankensteined benz, u know. Just my suggestion

  19. #19
    well im the 202 w/a 717.430 in it, and blind, its 130 in 3rd gear on stock 2.80 rear end... Ill roll race anything from 85mph... I have a 3.27LSD in the garage, just not time to install, I used to have a 3.27 open from an ordering misunderstanting. gearing was perfect. The 300e trans had blown the 3.27 diff to pices. I think it can take just about any ammount of abuse. That reminds me, I should take that atf outa there!

  20. #20
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    883
    3.27 gears will definitely help but the problem is you'd have to reprogram ESP b/c it couldn't take that big of a difference, it would throw a check light and run in limp mode.

  21. #21
    i have a 89 190E with a 3.2 m104.992 and a 722.369 transmission and have a 3.27 LSD and have no problem's with the rear end (came stock)

    as far as running 130 mph in 3rd gear?? i'd have to see it to believe it.. cause mine runs 80 mph at 4'gs in 4th (i have a auto and the 3.27) but i just dont see you making that

  22. #22
    Tuner/Vendor
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    93
    We'll have to get video this weekend, remember, the 300E 5-speed trans is geared differently than an auto trans...
    www.Turbobenz.com
    1987 MB 190E - Project M104 (For Sale)
    2005 Subaru WRX - The Daily
    Shop car -
    1996 MB C280 - 5 speed/3.27 LSD/3.2L M104 swap

  23. #23
    Originally posted by blind26
    We'll have to get video this weekend, remember, the 300E 5-speed trans is geared differently than an auto trans...
    130 in 3rd would put you close to what 200mph in 5th?? love to see the video

  24. #24
    well over 200 if the car really has the tq to do it, I wouldnt even attempt over 150 at this moment with the aerodynamics problems in the car. I can tell you I've taken her to about 140 in 4th and got a wopper of a ticket to boot.... Ill take a video with my cellphone of 3rd this weekend, that is if I can find the room...

    Ive done the math btw, if memory serves itll be 227 in 5th at redline.

  25. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,069
    Originally posted by LiVn_It_UP
    i have a 89 190E with a 3.2 m104.992 and a 722.369 transmission and have a 3.27 LSD and have no problem's with the rear end (came stock)

    as far as running 130 mph in 3rd gear?? i'd have to see it to believe it.. cause mine runs 80 mph at 4'gs in 4th (i have a auto and the 3.27) but i just dont see you making that
    is that the same transmission as in a manual c280? m104?
    can they handle some abuse can they?
    -Logan-

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •