Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Quality of ride: 18"s v 19"s

  1. #1

    Quality of ride: 18"s v 19"s

    I'm still undecided re 18"s or 19"s.
    Is there a perceivable difference in the quality of the ride between the two?

    My C280 is about to undergo some major cosmetic changes and I wondering whether I'll be needing a kidney belt if I go with 19"s!!!

    Obviously I'll be lowering the car to enhance the look and this will no doubt harden the ride. I 'm just hoping the W202 chassis is good enough to absorb/conceal the newfound bounciness.

    Anyone got any good/bad experiences they're willing to share?

  2. #2
    OG Moderator
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    2,827
    It's all about how thickness is the rubber.

    Let's say you ride 20" but with 225/45, I will guarantee you that the ride is going to be pretty nice compared to 18" with 205/40

    Tire brand and model also play a big factor.

    But for W202, The different of the sidewall height is:
    225/40/18 -> 90 mm/2 -> 45 mm
    235/35/19 -> 82.25 mm/2 -> 41.125 mm

    The differences? I don't think it's that much if you use the exact same brand of tire and model.

  3. #3
    OG Moderator kameraguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    2,283
    After going all the way to 19" (235/35/19 and 245/35/19), I found it was way too harsh and heavy for me. BUT, damn, it looked great.

    IMHO, for looks, 19"s are kewl. For performance, unless you get some ultra-light forged 19"s, expect a performance hit if coming from smaller performance wheels.

    18"s on the other hand weren't so bad all-around. I was perfectly happy with my 18"s.

    I'm back to 17"s now, but if I ever decide to go back to a bigger wheel, i'd probably only go as high as 18 in terms of ride comfort.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •