View Poll Results: How long are you planning to keep your 202?

Voters
41. You may not vote on this poll
  • Planning to sell her ASAP

    3 7.32%
  • About a couple of months

    1 2.44%
  • About a year

    2 4.88%
  • 2 years

    6 14.63%
  • 3 years

    4 9.76%
  • 5 years

    7 17.07%
  • 10 years

    2 4.88%
  • Untill I die!!!

    16 39.02%
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Performance Intake for M104?....

  1. #1
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    883

    Performance Intake for M104?....

    Hey guys,

    I am looking to make a performance intake kit for the M104. It will be a black powdercoated OEM looking design w/ K&N filter and a few other components.

    I am trying to get the targeted price down under $225 (Club202 price of $199 for everything).

    Would anyone be interested, I just want to get a head count of what to expect.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Norcal
    Posts
    2,864
    Id be intrested in a M111 N/A crankpully ! any info on that ?

  3. #3
    i'm interested in a set of these (well one's for a m104)



    and one of these for the m104


  4. #4
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    883

    which headers are those? just curious.

    M104 header & pulley is in prototype phase, im trying my best to get them out ASAP bear with me lol.

  5. #5
    Originally posted by omeyhomey
    which headers are those? just curious.
    not sure what headers those are the bolt patterns don't line up with the m104 but these's are wish the rest of his picture were up (had finished pictures of m104 headers but the links are broke)









    Originally posted by omeyhomey
    M104 header & pulley is in prototype phase, im trying my best to get them out ASAP bear with me lol.
    Yeah i know the wait is a killer

  6. #6
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    883
    that manfiold looks crude at best, but its a decent start. don't worry, i'm trying my best believe me

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,232
    i am down
    97 C280 RIP 09-14-07 killed by a reckless rice rocket jetta (I just try and remember the good times)

    ***C43***

    Clear Corners, ss oil filter, avantgrade grill, sport pedals, clk door pins

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    322
    I would be very keen for an intake

    Our M104s are going to be beasts afer omey is finished
    1995 C36 ///AMG

  9. #9
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    883
    Originally posted by benzboy
    I would be very keen for an intake

    Our M104s are going to be beasts afer omey is finished
    Thats my goal! the M104 was one of the best inline-6s ever made that was never given the recognition it deserved. There is no reason a C36 shouldn't be making at least 90-100HP/L (not only 76HP/L in C36 form) so hopefully I can get it to those levels. I would like to see C280s getting close to C36 numbers and C36 numbers getting well past C43 numbers. I just want to insure the headers & pulleys are 100% perfect so complications arise later. Your patience is much appreciated during this time of R&D. Thx again boys.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    223
    OOOOOH YEAH!

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    347
    I have read in a couple of books that there is hardly any gain by fitting tubular headers (which i assume yours will be) to an inline 6 which already has very efficient "split-type" cast headers, as they join cylinders 1,2,3 to one outlet and 4,5,6 to another outlet (such as the M104). Supposedly the gain to be expected by fitting tubular headers is 2-3 HP. Is it really worth going to such effort to gain power that you'd never notice?
    If you don\'t do it properly, don\'t waste our time!!

    The C280

    1995 C280
    1987 MK2 GTi 1800 8v

  12. #12
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    883
    Originally posted by C280/////AMG
    I have read in a couple of books that there is hardly any gain by fitting tubular headers (which i assume yours will be) to an inline 6 which already has very efficient "split-type" cast headers, as they join cylinders 1,2,3 to one outlet and 4,5,6 to another outlet (such as the M104). Supposedly the gain to be expected by fitting tubular headers is 2-3 HP. Is it really worth going to such effort to gain power that you'd never notice?

    ALL inline 6's have that 123 456 design haha. of course you can gain off of headers like that. Remember they are still cast log style manifolds with very poor merge sections and etc. I gained 12 wheel HP on my M3 engine which has identical stock header design simply by switching to aftermarket design (18wheel HP & torque w/ crank pulley, although M104 should make more i feel). Don't make assumptions when it comes to these things b/c you never know how its gonna react. i'd be shocked if I couldn't squeeze out 8-12HP just by headers alone depend if C280 or C36

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    347
    well that sounds great!!! anything to squeeze a couple more horses from my M104!! Dyno results and shipping costs will be the deciding factors...
    If you don\'t do it properly, don\'t waste our time!!

    The C280

    1995 C280
    1987 MK2 GTi 1800 8v

  14. #14
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    14
    bumping this thread to see if anything came of it...
    ____________

    190e 2.6 (converting to Sportline & beyond)

    190e 2.6 Sportline LE (converting to something *faster* than any other stock w201)
    __________________
    Read Atlas Shrugged

    \"In this way it is ensured that always the last command will be carried out.\" - ??

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •