Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 32

Thread: H&R versus Eibach

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    167

    H&R versus Eibach

    which springs are stiffer
    which ones are lower
    b/c i am planning to add 18"s and dont wont no gap left but at the same time i dont want them to be too low cause we have huge pot holes here in NY.
    also may i keep my stock C36 shocks with new springs? look if 18s with stock springs will loook nice then i will skip the springs but if the gap is there and huge one then i dunno.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    639
    as far as lowering, I know that H&R are a little bit lower than Eibach pro-kit, it's about 10mm of difference.

    But consider that exist also a lower kit for Eibach, I belive available also for W202.

    Regarding stiffening, sorry I do not know.

    Hi

  3. #3
    u can use spring pads to change the height of the car in small increments till u get the right amount. dealers got these and arent' too exp.
    95 C220 Moonstone/Gray mb-tex
    MODS
    - Replica Avantgarde Grill
    - Flat hood Emblem
    - Plat +4 plugs
    - In Dash Pioneer CD and pioneer speakers
    - XM Radio
    - pioneer 12\" DVC Sub
    - Boss amp
    - Blue headlights & APC signals
    - H&R Springs
    - Bilstein sports up front
    - 17\" MOMO\'s

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    167
    explain me more about the spring pads. do they raise or lower the car?
    how much they go for?

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    435
    Originally posted by redc36
    explain me more about the spring pads. do they raise or lower the car?
    how much they go for?
    ALL of your questions can be answered, by simply using " SEARCH ".
    So, let your finger do the walking you lazy ass !
    Yes, I have a few mods, but they\'re so discrete, my wife hasn\'t noticed them.

    2000 C 230 K

  6. #6
    What's up red, yeah this has been discussed many many times. H&R = lower drop, I have Eibach Pro Kits, but the pads vary in thickness and I believe they go above the springs. I recently had mine changed to adjust my ride height and I have 18" AMG Monos on my car. Anyways, you can raise or lower you car based on the pad thickness you choose.
    cfortythreezie

  7. #7
    Moderator
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    4,927
    H&R+ Stiffer, lower, more performance based
    Eibach= less stiff, better ride, not as much drop
    BAN HIS ASS!!
    744 C36 AMG- carlsson
    040 C43- way to many modifications
    744 CLK55- even more mods
    CLS55 IWC edition
    744 CLK500 Rocket Bunny widebody

  8. #8
    OG Moderator
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    2,244
    The H&R kit doesnt drop a 202 that much more!.. it is more but not by much.. I think the Eibach kit is pretty nice, good drop.. nice ride. and when u use #1 pads its a really nice drop!! can u say... tucking?!!
    *2002 E320 4Matic Wagon* Daily
    --Not lowered—18" Alphards—Stock exhaust.
    Lots Coming—3 piece 18" AMG Aero II—Custom Bags—Wide Fenders—W210 E55 Engine Swap with 4matic—

    *1999 C230K Turbo* Track Car
    --18" SL55 AMG's--KW V2 Suspension--SLK55 Front and Rear Brake--Wiechers Braces--Custom GT28 Turbo--Custom 3" Exhaust--68mm Throttle body--450cc Injectors--Custom Intake Manifold--Custom liquid to air intercooler--C36 Rear--Brabus Front--

  9. #9
    whats the difference between 94-95 and 96-00 springs?
    95 C220 Moonstone/Gray mb-tex
    MODS
    - Replica Avantgarde Grill
    - Flat hood Emblem
    - Plat +4 plugs
    - In Dash Pioneer CD and pioneer speakers
    - XM Radio
    - pioneer 12\" DVC Sub
    - Boss amp
    - Blue headlights & APC signals
    - H&R Springs
    - Bilstein sports up front
    - 17\" MOMO\'s

  10. #10
    In Charge martattack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Kirkland, WA
    Posts
    816
    The 94-95 models used W201 style spring pads, where as the 96+ used W210 style spring pads. The spring pads were a bit different, so they springs are different accordingly. I read you can put 210 style pads on a 94 and used the newer style springs.

    2012 535i
    2005 545i - Retired
    1994 C280 - Retired

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    435
    Originally posted by fastmayte
    whats the difference between 94-95 and 96-00 springs?
    On 94/95 the end of the spring is ground flat, where it seats against the pad.
    On 96 +, the coil of the spring just ends, as if you cut it off!
    BoominBenz is probably right.
    Can't see why you couldn't use the 210 xxxx pads with 96 + springs on a 94/95.
    Yes, I have a few mods, but they\'re so discrete, my wife hasn\'t noticed them.

    2000 C 230 K

  12. #12
    Originally posted by manny
    On 94/95 the end of the spring is ground flat, where it seats against the pad.
    On 96 +, the coil of the spring just ends, as if you cut it off!
    BoominBenz is probably right.
    Can't see why you couldn't use the 210 xxxx pads with 96 + springs on a 94/95.
    Remeber the newer the model the more cost cutting measures were put in place as Mercedes became Chryslerized!

  13. #13
    I agreed with cthirtysizzle I have the same stuff put on my car (silver 96 c36) and so far I love it.

    Eibach suspension kit
    Eibach Springs
    with Tokico Adjustable shocks

    I have no gap at all and I am rollin on 18" Monoblock II

    But anytime you lower your car doesn't matter where you are, you just have to becareful at all time. That's the price you have to pay for having such a nice ride
    Thi (ty) Tu
    Salt Lake City, Utah(US.A.)
    -dame is really cold here-

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    833
    I have Eibach and if I had a choice again, I'd go H&R. These are too soft.


  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    167
    maybe i should by h&r and we trade or something. dunno yet. if i get springs i need to change shocks too.

    i am also gonna look for euro amg springs
    i dont want to be too harsh of a drive cause nyc roads are horrible.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    168
    I have H&R Sports on mine. When I retained the stock AMG/Bilstein shocks the ride was way too harsh/bouncy. However when I installed the Bilstein Sports w/ Poly shock bushings/stops, the ride improved dramatically. The car is absolutely fantastic on high speed staight runs or wild runs through the twistys.

    However, bumps at 40 mph and under are very noticeable and the ride is not nearly as "plush" as some would expect from a Benz. Hell, that's the price to pay for handling. My H&R/Bilstein set up works far better than the AMG stock set-up and gives me a lot more confidence in the corners and it has almost eliminated body roll.

    I've heard that Eibach's are a little softer and give a better ride but a Benz performance tuner told me to stick with the H&R's as they will work much better at high speeds.
    Marc
    [SIZE=\"1\"]Silver/Black 2005 C55 AMG: fully loaded, evosport UDP\'s, AMS billet crank pulley, phenolic spacers, renntech cf airbox, green filters, elite engineering Z06 anondized catch can, sprintbooster, 030 SLK AMG rear calipers & rotors, SS braided brake lines, 18\" SLK AMG Turbines (summer), 18\" OZ Superleggera\'s (winter), sealth front/rear K40 radar detectors and laser jammers, MB iPod integration kit (mmclaw@optonline.net).[/SIZE]

  17. #17
    Hey,

    I hope this isn't taken the wrong way or anything but......I just bought a set of H&R springs for my '98 C280. Right after I bought them I got a really nice price on an H&R cup kit, so I bought that. Now I am sitting on an extra set of H&R springs that need a good home. I havn't posted them in classifieds yet because my post count isn't high enough. I guess I could post enough B.S. threads, But I'm not going to do that. Anyway I'll post them in another 10 threads or so, but in the meantime if anyone is interested lmk. H&R p# 29749-2, and a link----------------
    http://www.hrsprings.com/site/index.html

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    715
    Originally posted by Tump43
    I have H&R Sports on mine. When I retained the stock AMG/Bilstein shocks the ride was way too harsh/bouncy. However when I installed the Bilstein Sports w/ Poly shock bushings/stops, the ride improved dramatically. The car is absolutely fantastic on high speed staight runs or wild runs through the twistys.

    However, bumps at 40 mph and under are very noticeable and the ride is not nearly as "plush" as some would expect from a Benz. Hell, that's the price to pay for handling. My H&R/Bilstein set up works far better than the AMG stock set-up and gives me a lot more confidence in the corners and it has almost eliminated body roll.

    I've heard that Eibach's are a little softer and give a better ride but a Benz performance tuner told me to stick with the H&R's as they will work much better at high speeds.
    Hey what's up Marc ,It's Carl. I'm trying to decide which shock setup to use HD or Sport(Bilstein),But I'm definitely going to go with the eibach springs.Those h&r springs are so damn harsh,I had them on my eagle Talon .Dropped the car too low and they sag after a while.The coils on the eibach springs are much thicker in comparison so this is why one gets a better ride. I just dont know which shock Hd or sport, or which spring pads to get. PS by the way i just got bac from MD.Perhaps i could come up and see your car this wknd. Talk to you lata!



    silver 1998 AMG c43 to C55 convert(293whp/307lbft TQ) ,1999 M3,1995 400 whp eagle Talon Tsi AWD,94 BMW 325i to M332i(M3)conversion

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    715
    Originally posted by coolcarlskic43
    Hey what's up Marc ,It's Carl. I'm trying to decide which shock setup to use HD or Sport(Bilstein),But I'm definitely going to go with the eibach springs.Those h&r springs are so damn harsh,I had them on my eagle Talon .Dropped the car too low and they sag after a while.Put the eibachs on and what a difference.The car still sat almost as low but the ride and handling definitely felt better too me.The coils on the eibach springs are much thicker in comparison so this is why one gets a better ride. I just dont know which shock Hd or sport, or which spring pads to get. PS by the way I just got bac from MD.Perhaps I could come up and see your car this wknd. Talk to you lata!



    silver 1998 AMG c43 to C55 convert(293whp/307lbft TQ) ,1999 M3,1995 400 whp eagle Talon Tsi AWD,94 BMW 325i to M332i(M3)conversion

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    715
    Originally posted by coolcarlskic43
    Hey what's up Marc ,It's Carl. I'm trying to decide which shock setup to use HD or Sport(Bilstein),But I'm definitely going to go with the eibach springs.Those h&r springs are so damn harsh,I had them on my eagle Talon .Dropped the car too low and they sag after a while.Put the eibachs on and what a difference.The car still sat almost as low but the ride and handling definitely felt better too me.The coils on the eibach springs are much thicker in comparison so this is why one gets a better ride. I just dont know which shock Hd or sport, or which spring pads to get. PS by the way I just got bac from MD.Perhaps I could come up and see your car this wknd. Talk to you lata!



    silver 1998 AMG c43 to C55 convert(293whp/307lbft TQ) ,1999 M3,1995 400 whp eagle Talon Tsi AWD,94 BMW 325i to M332i(M3)conversion

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    715
    oops sorry about the multiples, tried to edit and clicked on Quote by mistake!! Damn!



    silver 1998 AMG c43 to C55 convert(293whp/307lbft TQ) ,1999 M3,1995 400 whp eagle Talon Tsi AWD,94 BMW 325i to M332i(M3)conversion

  22. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    713
    Originally posted by redc36
    maybe i should by h&r and we trade or something. dunno yet. if i get springs i need to change shocks too.

    i am also gonna look for euro amg springs
    i dont want to be too harsh of a drive cause nyc roads are horrible.
    I have eibach's with Bilstein sports. Rides almost like stock for a C36.
    2005 TSX Graphite Pearl Auto With NAVI
    Autostart Autostarter
    Progress Rear Sway Bar
    USDM Bodykit
    USDM Foglights

    1997 AMG C36 (RIP Thank God)
    OEM Bosche Clear Corners
    OEM AdvanteGarde Grill
    Bilstein Sport Shocks
    Eibach Springs
    Zender rear lip spoiler
    Speedybenz custom rear camber arms
    W210 mirrors

  23. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    167
    how safe is it to use spring pads #1 on stock setup for the front? will it wear out quickly. will other components fail quicker.
    i am really interested only lowering the front a bit since i am now officially on the budget b/c of other things.

  24. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    715
    Originally posted by Rocky
    I have eibach's with Bilstein sports. Rides almost like stock for a C36.
    The car should handle alot better though correct? What spring pads r u using?



    silver 1998 AMG c43 to C55 convert(293whp/307lbft TQ) ,1999 M3,1995 400 whp eagle Talon Tsi AWD,94 BMW 325i to M332i(M3)conversion

  25. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    715
    Originally posted by redc36
    how safe is it to use spring pads #1 on stock setup for the front? will it wear out quickly. will other components fail quicker.
    i am really interested only lowering the front a bit since i am now officially on the budget b/c of other things.
    Best way to lower car is with springs. No way around it!



    silver 1998 AMG c43 to C55 convert(293whp/307lbft TQ) ,1999 M3,1995 400 whp eagle Talon Tsi AWD,94 BMW 325i to M332i(M3)conversion

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •